Isadora Workshop
When designing or implementing audio for a performance have you ever felt limited by what can be achieved with a pair of CD players? Have you considered using digital video in your performances but been held back because of clumsy interfaces or the limitations of Power Point? Have you ever dreamed of having a single operator able to run the audio, video and even lighting elements from one system? If so this workshop is for you.
Developed by Mark Coniglio, Isadora is a flexible graphic environment that provides interactive control over digital media, with special emphasis on audio and the real-time manipulation of digital video. Isadora is being used by hundreds of artists worldwide including the Royal Shakespear Company, Mort Subotnick, Rosemary Lee, Maya Ciarrocchi (for Bebe Miller and Merce Cunningham), VJ Solu, Lingo Dance Theater, Gretchen Schiller, and others.
Participants in the workshop will learn key skills required for using Isadora to design and run the audio and video elements for multimedia performances. The workshop begins at the University of Denver with an in-depth exploration of the software, providing an emphasis on basic approaches to utilizing Isadora as an audio and video solution within a theatre environment. We will then meet at the Bindery Space where participants will apply their new skills within a working theatre.
When:
March 15th 9:00 am - 1:00 pm @ the University of Denver
March 22nd 9:00 am - 6 pm starting @ the University of Denver and ending @ the Bindery | Space
Where:
University of Denver
2000 E. Asbury
Sturm Hall, Room 354
Bindery | Space
2180 Stout St, Denver, CO
Cost for the workshop is $50. Please make checks out to: The LIDA Project
Presented by:
Brian Freeland, Alex Oliszewski, and Stacey Sotosky
Brian has designed sound for The LIDA Project, Paragon Theatre Company, Modern Muse, Shadow Theatre Company, and Curious Theatre Company where he is resident sound designer. He is a 2-time Henry Award nominee and 3-time Denver Post Ovation Award nominee for his sound designs. Brian is also the artistic director of both The LIDA Project and the new political theatre collective Countdown to Zero.
Alex has been working professionally in the theatre as a sound operator and designer for six years. Alex is also the founder of Penumbra Theatre Company. Through his work with Penumbra he has developed a wide range of skills integrating technology and theatrical performance.
Stacey Sotosky is a performance cinema artist and is finishing up her MFA in electronic media arts at the University of Denver. She is currently in development of her thesis production which will utilize Isadora as a performance tool.
Applicants should have a basic understanding of using a computer, (i.e., opening and saving files, copying and pasting information, basic navigational skills, etc.) Computers will be provided for the workshop however you are welcome to bring your own laptop.*
The application form is due by March 14th. Payment is due on or before March 15th.
*Laptop requirements:
If you can provide your own laptop be sure it meets these requirements:
Macintosh: G5 or Intel based computer with bus speed of 1.5 Ghz and 1.0 GB of RAM; Mac OS X 10.3.9 or greater; QuickTime 7.0 or greater must be installed.
Windows laptop with bus speed of at least 1.8 Ghz and 1.0 GB of RAM; windows XP:
QuickTime 7.0 or greater must be installed.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Monday, March 03, 2008
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
How to make Colored Soap Bubbles
Can't wait for Zubbles anymore?!
http://chemistry.about.com/od/chemistryhowtoguide/ht/colorbubble.htm
-A
http://chemistry.about.com/od/chemistryhowtoguide/ht/colorbubble.htm
-A
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
Monday, December 03, 2007
Monday, October 15, 2007
Tuesday, October 09, 2007
Monday, September 17, 2007
Performance Cinema Tag Cloud
Dear World,
I present an invisible tag cloud generated from "Towards a Theory of Performance Cinema" by Henry Warwick.
(The Tag Cloud is located just below. Move your mouse around down there to see the different words. Moving your mouse around in different patterns generates different linear connections between the ideas. Does this count as interactive/dynamic memeplex?)
I What is performance cinema Performance Cinema sits between traditional passive cinematic experience and the of live music Like standard it requires a picture an audience that through their very in event as meaningful This essential feature not to be underestimated will with some later important this creative practice Cinematic which up just was largely by film theory The video art especially development digital has we all know expand boundaries creativity With major theatre chains presently installing projectors theatres unipolar dominance technology now are seeing multipolar system uses both technologies too entertainment must also way field including due costs vs effect Moore s Law on but completely from common new at because about one obvious powerful would instruments presentation visual audio data performers or actors That so ll elaborate discuss what can components should made developed 1 Points editing image etc points well 2 narrative storytelling cause narratives structures Due reasons such its heritage experimental historical relationship academic for most aspects genre work terms theoretical part practitioners really issues narrativity take variety subject story telling how context 3 Most camera imagery without often even like over production However think needn t case hits point industry co option At come values necessarily thing level investment serve re focus public issue acquisition rich complex history number It object symposium solve particular there many other sources kind more where use footage found thusly our sense opposed In phenomenon perfectly consider projected element elements working theatrical sensibility actor vice versa difference they cathexis engage emotional feedback musicians who playing musician stage likely artists less much performer cathectic environment amplified seek out upon them human form becomes main method artist along continuum no proximate specific conceptual into any places these two believe active prove valuable category drive repurposing were large spaces i e Abstract Visualisation musical long evolved have been discussed Fred here his if could find him improvised visuals abstract brought aesthetically interesting signifiers fictive space mis en scene clips notion indeed players whether player Technically since exists simulation objects everything always already different non outside living things Hence consideration then One machine systems create simply question performing software may quite programmer Who do Where people why excited her felt us logical critical notions qualities peculiar medium motion projection used time ubiquity acquire own A m sure San Francisco only happen easily New few same distribution computer blessed As noted makes today political considerations While regard immediate inform Another see each fundamentally big sets Art necessity exposure those least make discourse aesthetic Now But speak developments past years good enough forces quickly world personal am developing Jitter he If my hardware continue need increasingly practices language before others might commercial IF left hands critics thinking marginalised interest maintaining hegemony fictional convinced thrive needs address works vagaries market balkanised Given inherent feel culture variant bring change rather than truly vital nearly concert Therefore value endeavour Some growing gallery museum industrial electronic coming processing devices cultural Symposium helping define aspect play movie problems parts automated chain huge corporations fact making present highly configuration society Artists don around themselves configurations VJ independent being share moment problem Internal External Problems internal first larger solved facing These run challenges next several Personality Issues various affective relative place sound department century reinforced early saw success rejected within films kinds had start Just great light shows rock deck soon came Passive historically crucial social show external They mindshare high AMC year doing something certain Also keep 000 lumen projector weighs indicated vibrant contemporary TV watching connecting fundamental LIVE My evolution idea Jersey cover band filled punk bass likes Squire John Wetton Shulman able pretty interested Scriabin organ triggered eventually wanted slides DC ideas me when screen needed looked Theory fit realised dots connected
Cheers,
Alex
I present an invisible tag cloud generated from "Towards a Theory of Performance Cinema" by Henry Warwick.
(The Tag Cloud is located just below. Move your mouse around down there to see the different words. Moving your mouse around in different patterns generates different linear connections between the ideas. Does this count as interactive/dynamic memeplex?)
I What is performance cinema Performance Cinema sits between traditional passive cinematic experience and the of live music Like standard it requires a picture an audience that through their very in event as meaningful This essential feature not to be underestimated will with some later important this creative practice Cinematic which up just was largely by film theory The video art especially development digital has we all know expand boundaries creativity With major theatre chains presently installing projectors theatres unipolar dominance technology now are seeing multipolar system uses both technologies too entertainment must also way field including due costs vs effect Moore s Law on but completely from common new at because about one obvious powerful would instruments presentation visual audio data performers or actors That so ll elaborate discuss what can components should made developed 1 Points editing image etc points well 2 narrative storytelling cause narratives structures Due reasons such its heritage experimental historical relationship academic for most aspects genre work terms theoretical part practitioners really issues narrativity take variety subject story telling how context 3 Most camera imagery without often even like over production However think needn t case hits point industry co option At come values necessarily thing level investment serve re focus public issue acquisition rich complex history number It object symposium solve particular there many other sources kind more where use footage found thusly our sense opposed In phenomenon perfectly consider projected element elements working theatrical sensibility actor vice versa difference they cathexis engage emotional feedback musicians who playing musician stage likely artists less much performer cathectic environment amplified seek out upon them human form becomes main method artist along continuum no proximate specific conceptual into any places these two believe active prove valuable category drive repurposing were large spaces i e Abstract Visualisation musical long evolved have been discussed Fred here his if could find him improvised visuals abstract brought aesthetically interesting signifiers fictive space mis en scene clips notion indeed players whether player Technically since exists simulation objects everything always already different non outside living things Hence consideration then One machine systems create simply question performing software may quite programmer Who do Where people why excited her felt us logical critical notions qualities peculiar medium motion projection used time ubiquity acquire own A m sure San Francisco only happen easily New few same distribution computer blessed As noted makes today political considerations While regard immediate inform Another see each fundamentally big sets Art necessity exposure those least make discourse aesthetic Now But speak developments past years good enough forces quickly world personal am developing Jitter he If my hardware continue need increasingly practices language before others might commercial IF left hands critics thinking marginalised interest maintaining hegemony fictional convinced thrive needs address works vagaries market balkanised Given inherent feel culture variant bring change rather than truly vital nearly concert Therefore value endeavour Some growing gallery museum industrial electronic coming processing devices cultural Symposium helping define aspect play movie problems parts automated chain huge corporations fact making present highly configuration society Artists don around themselves configurations VJ independent being share moment problem Internal External Problems internal first larger solved facing These run challenges next several Personality Issues various affective relative place sound department century reinforced early saw success rejected within films kinds had start Just great light shows rock deck soon came Passive historically crucial social show external They mindshare high AMC year doing something certain Also keep 000 lumen projector weighs indicated vibrant contemporary TV watching connecting fundamental LIVE My evolution idea Jersey cover band filled punk bass likes Squire John Wetton Shulman able pretty interested Scriabin organ triggered eventually wanted slides DC ideas me when screen needed looked Theory fit realised dots connected
Cheers,
Alex
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


